lastID = -10083925
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Winchell, Lloyd
    PFAS Fate in Pyrolysis System Reflecting Full-Scale Configurations: Thermal Oxidizer Impacts
    Access Water
    Water Environment Federation
    October 11, 2022
    May 28, 2025
    https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10083925
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    Winchell, Lloyd. PFAS Fate in Pyrolysis System Reflecting Full-Scale Configurations: Thermal Oxidizer Impacts. Water Environment Federation, 2022. Accessed May 28, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10083925.
    MLA Back (from MLA)
    Winchell, Lloyd. PFAS Fate in Pyrolysis System Reflecting Full-Scale Configurations: Thermal Oxidizer Impacts. Water Environment Federation, 2022. Web. 28 May. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10083925>.
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Start of menu
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: PFAS Fate in Pyrolysis System Reflecting Full-Scale Configurations: Thermal Oxidizer...
PFAS Fate in Pyrolysis System Reflecting Full-Scale Configurations: Thermal Oxidizer Impacts
  • Browse
  • CompilationsToggle child pages
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools
End of menu
Start of menu

Related contents

Loading related content
End of menu
Start of menu

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2023-08-16 08:19:56 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-10-05 12:42:53 Adam Phillips Release
  • 2022-10-05 11:51:15 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-10-05 11:51:14 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-10-05 09:37:23 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-10-05 09:37:22 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-10-05 09:11:07 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-09-07 11:40:06 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-09-07 11:40:05 Adam Phillips
End of menu
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: PFAS Fate in Pyrolysis System Reflecting Full-Scale Configurations: Thermal Oxidizer...
PFAS Fate in Pyrolysis System Reflecting Full-Scale Configurations: Thermal Oxidizer Impacts

PFAS Fate in Pyrolysis System Reflecting Full-Scale Configurations: Thermal Oxidizer Impacts

PFAS Fate in Pyrolysis System Reflecting Full-Scale Configurations: Thermal Oxidizer Impacts

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: PFAS Fate in Pyrolysis System Reflecting Full-Scale Configurations: Thermal Oxidizer...
PFAS Fate in Pyrolysis System Reflecting Full-Scale Configurations: Thermal Oxidizer Impacts
Abstract
Introduction
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are becoming an increasingly scrutinized and studied class of pollutants due to their widespread use and environmental contamination leading to federal and state health-based guidance and regulatory values. PFAS resist environmental degradation and can accumulate in the urban water cycle, including wastewater systems (Winchell et al., 2021c). Furthermore, various PFAS will migrate to wastewater solids (termed biosolids when stabilized) where conventional treatment technologies have little to no effect on the PFAS content of the solids (Hamid et al., 2016, Yu et al., 2009, Loos et al., 2018, Gallen et al., 2018, Mailler et al., 2017, Kim Lazcano et al., 2019). PFAS in biosolids have the potential to derail beneficial reuse via land application due to the potential impacts to groundwater, and transfer into agricultural crops (Lee et al., 2014, Zhang et al., 2015, Navarro et al., 2017, Ghisi et al., 2019). Thermal treatment is the only process currently identified to reliably destroy PFAS (USEPA, 2020a), but destruction efficiency must be confirmed to avoid worsening atmospheric pollution and deposition (Shafer et al., 2020). While incineration shows promise for PFAS destruction (Winchell et al., 2021a), utilities are looking to thermal treatment alternatives that do not require the same permitting rigor and generate a higher value solid residual. Pyrolysis fits these requirements.
Current Understanding
Pyrolysis systems include more than the reactor thermally processing the feedstock in a reducing atmosphere, see Figure 1. Pyrolytic reactions consume and release heat energy, with an overall heat flow generally considered zero when processing dry feedstocks (Basu, 2013). Dewatered wastewater solids require drying to evaporate water prior to treatment in the pyrolyzer. Contemporary systems recycle heat for drying and pyrolysis by processing the fuel rich off-gas from pyrolysis through a thermal oxidizer. Subsequent processes include removal and handling of the solid residual, biochar, and further cleaning of the flue gas from the thermal oxidizer. The pyrolysis systems offers several opportunities to remove and possibly destroy PFAS. Pollutant destruction and removal efficiency (DRE) in high-temperature thermal processes can generally be benchmarked by the '3 T's' (i.e., time, temperature, and turbulence). Table 1 contains key operating parameters for a recent survey of technology suppliers. The pyrolyzer can reach temperatures up to 950°C, depending on the goals of the solid and gas residuals, with several second residence times for the off-gas and 15-20 minutes for the solids. The thermal oxidizer conditions can likewise be tailored, but typically process the off-gas for over two seconds at over 850°C. PFAS destruction requirements often quoted only refer to temperature (>1,000°C) based on limited data sets designed for hazardous waste incineration (Winchell et al, 2021a) which can lead to premature conclusions about currently available high-temperature processes. The wastewater industry requires a better understanding on the fate of PFAS through these systems. Several studies have started looking into the fate of PFAS through pyrolysis systems processing wastewater solids. Kim et al. (2015) observed no significant change of PFAS in the biochar after pyrolysis of wastewater solids at 300 and 700°C in a laboratory setup. Kundu et al. (2021), however demonstrated removal of all measured PFAS species in biochar at temperatures ranging from 500 – 600°C. Williams et al (2021) detected three PFAS of 28 evaluated in biochar at 500°C and none after 700°C. Williams et al (2021) also analyzed the off-gas stream and reported a combined mass removal efficiency of 84.4 and 95.6 percent of measured PFAS when including the levels in the biochar at the same two experimental temperatures, respectively. The body of research does not consider the impacts of the thermal oxidizer on the gas-phase outlet.
Experimental Approach
A research consortium partnered to begin evaluating the fate of PFAS through the entire pyrolysis process. The initial phase of the research considers the fate of PFAS through laboratory-scale drying, pyrolysis, and thermal oxidation systems. Collaborative funding of the partners supported construction of a laboratory-scale system at Western University's Institute for Chemicals and Fuels from Alternative Resources (ICFAR). Figure 2 shows the basic configuration of the laboratory system. Dried wastewater solids will be loaded into a 'biomass' feed hopper and metered into the mechanically stirred pyrolyzer. Off-gas can be processed through a condensing system, reflective of historical applications, or through a thermal oxidizer. The system will process roughly one kilogram per hour of dried material under conditions reflecting a currently operating full-scale system at the Silicon Valley Clean Water treatment facility in Redwood City, CA. Construction and commissioning of the laboratory system will be completed in December of 2021. PFAS sampling and analysis poses a significant challenge given the complexity, diversity, and novelty of the target substances (Winchell et al., 2021b). This research will employ the latest standardized and research methods. All streams into and out of the system will be sampled including solid and gas-phases at the laboratory scale. Using targeted, non-targeted analysis (NTA), total organic fluorine (TOF), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) this study will aim to close the PFAS mass balance across the system to the extent possible within current analytical constraints. Preliminary assessment of the donor wastewater solids and laboratory system operation suggest specific PFAS can be detected, above the method reporting limits, in the gas emissions at high DREs, see Figure 3. Furthermore, to our knowledge NTA has not been reported yet on wastewater solid pyrolysis systems. NTA identifies PFAS not currently evaluated for in the standardized USEPA Method 537 (2020b). This will help determine what 'other' PFAS are present in wastewater solids, biochar, and gas emissions.
Conclusions
This paper and presentation will provide the WEF audience a detailed summary of the current published literature on the fate of PFAS through pyrolysis systems. This summary identifies the gaps in knowledge and the proposed study takes the first step in evaluating the emissions from the system post thermal oxidation, consistent with existing configurations. An in-depth discussion on the study sampling and analytical procedures will provide the wastewater community a valuable resource on PFAS measurement. Additional value will be provided by way of the available study results.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
PFAS partition to the solids generated during wastewater. Pyrolysis systems offer the potential to destroy PFAS, especially when coupled with a thermal oxidizer for off-gas treatment. Limited information can be found on the fate of PFAS through high-temperature process. This paper discusses a collaborative research effort to define PFAS behavior through a laboratory-scale pyrolyzer and thermal oxidizer validated against performance from a full-scale facility.
SpeakerWinchell, Lloyd
Presentation time
14:00:00
14:15:00
Session time
13:30:00
15:00:00
TopicIntermediate Level, Biosolids and Residuals, PFAS
TopicIntermediate Level, Biosolids and Residuals, PFAS
Author(s)
Winchell, Lloyd
Author(s)Lloyd Winchell1; Franco Berruti2; Alexandre Miot3; John Ross4; Mary L. Romero5; Aren Hansen6
Author affiliation(s)Brown and Caldwell, St. Paul, MN1; Institute for Chemicals and Fuels from Alternative Resources, ON, Canada2; Silicon Valley Clean Water, Redwood City,CA3; Brown and Caldwell, Detroit, MI4; Brown and Caldwell, Walnut Creek, CA5; Brown and Caldwell, Walnut Creek, CA6
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2022
DOI10.2175/193864718825158645
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2022
Word count12

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'PFAS Fate in Pyrolysis System Reflecting Full-Scale Configurations: Thermal Oxidizer Impacts'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: PFAS Fate in Pyrolysis System Reflecting Full-Scale Configurations: Thermal Oxidizer...
PFAS Fate in Pyrolysis System Reflecting Full-Scale Configurations: Thermal Oxidizer Impacts
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:$9.50
-10083925
Get access
-10083925
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'PFAS Fate in Pyrolysis System Reflecting Full-Scale Configurations: Thermal Oxidizer Impacts'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Start of menu

Details

Description: PFAS Fate in Pyrolysis System Reflecting Full-Scale Configurations: Thermal Oxidizer...
PFAS Fate in Pyrolysis System Reflecting Full-Scale Configurations: Thermal Oxidizer Impacts
Abstract
Introduction
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are becoming an increasingly scrutinized and studied class of pollutants due to their widespread use and environmental contamination leading to federal and state health-based guidance and regulatory values. PFAS resist environmental degradation and can accumulate in the urban water cycle, including wastewater systems (Winchell et al., 2021c). Furthermore, various PFAS will migrate to wastewater solids (termed biosolids when stabilized) where conventional treatment technologies have little to no effect on the PFAS content of the solids (Hamid et al., 2016, Yu et al., 2009, Loos et al., 2018, Gallen et al., 2018, Mailler et al., 2017, Kim Lazcano et al., 2019). PFAS in biosolids have the potential to derail beneficial reuse via land application due to the potential impacts to groundwater, and transfer into agricultural crops (Lee et al., 2014, Zhang et al., 2015, Navarro et al., 2017, Ghisi et al., 2019). Thermal treatment is the only process currently identified to reliably destroy PFAS (USEPA, 2020a), but destruction efficiency must be confirmed to avoid worsening atmospheric pollution and deposition (Shafer et al., 2020). While incineration shows promise for PFAS destruction (Winchell et al., 2021a), utilities are looking to thermal treatment alternatives that do not require the same permitting rigor and generate a higher value solid residual. Pyrolysis fits these requirements.
Current Understanding
Pyrolysis systems include more than the reactor thermally processing the feedstock in a reducing atmosphere, see Figure 1. Pyrolytic reactions consume and release heat energy, with an overall heat flow generally considered zero when processing dry feedstocks (Basu, 2013). Dewatered wastewater solids require drying to evaporate water prior to treatment in the pyrolyzer. Contemporary systems recycle heat for drying and pyrolysis by processing the fuel rich off-gas from pyrolysis through a thermal oxidizer. Subsequent processes include removal and handling of the solid residual, biochar, and further cleaning of the flue gas from the thermal oxidizer. The pyrolysis systems offers several opportunities to remove and possibly destroy PFAS. Pollutant destruction and removal efficiency (DRE) in high-temperature thermal processes can generally be benchmarked by the '3 T's' (i.e., time, temperature, and turbulence). Table 1 contains key operating parameters for a recent survey of technology suppliers. The pyrolyzer can reach temperatures up to 950°C, depending on the goals of the solid and gas residuals, with several second residence times for the off-gas and 15-20 minutes for the solids. The thermal oxidizer conditions can likewise be tailored, but typically process the off-gas for over two seconds at over 850°C. PFAS destruction requirements often quoted only refer to temperature (>1,000°C) based on limited data sets designed for hazardous waste incineration (Winchell et al, 2021a) which can lead to premature conclusions about currently available high-temperature processes. The wastewater industry requires a better understanding on the fate of PFAS through these systems. Several studies have started looking into the fate of PFAS through pyrolysis systems processing wastewater solids. Kim et al. (2015) observed no significant change of PFAS in the biochar after pyrolysis of wastewater solids at 300 and 700°C in a laboratory setup. Kundu et al. (2021), however demonstrated removal of all measured PFAS species in biochar at temperatures ranging from 500 – 600°C. Williams et al (2021) detected three PFAS of 28 evaluated in biochar at 500°C and none after 700°C. Williams et al (2021) also analyzed the off-gas stream and reported a combined mass removal efficiency of 84.4 and 95.6 percent of measured PFAS when including the levels in the biochar at the same two experimental temperatures, respectively. The body of research does not consider the impacts of the thermal oxidizer on the gas-phase outlet.
Experimental Approach
A research consortium partnered to begin evaluating the fate of PFAS through the entire pyrolysis process. The initial phase of the research considers the fate of PFAS through laboratory-scale drying, pyrolysis, and thermal oxidation systems. Collaborative funding of the partners supported construction of a laboratory-scale system at Western University's Institute for Chemicals and Fuels from Alternative Resources (ICFAR). Figure 2 shows the basic configuration of the laboratory system. Dried wastewater solids will be loaded into a 'biomass' feed hopper and metered into the mechanically stirred pyrolyzer. Off-gas can be processed through a condensing system, reflective of historical applications, or through a thermal oxidizer. The system will process roughly one kilogram per hour of dried material under conditions reflecting a currently operating full-scale system at the Silicon Valley Clean Water treatment facility in Redwood City, CA. Construction and commissioning of the laboratory system will be completed in December of 2021. PFAS sampling and analysis poses a significant challenge given the complexity, diversity, and novelty of the target substances (Winchell et al., 2021b). This research will employ the latest standardized and research methods. All streams into and out of the system will be sampled including solid and gas-phases at the laboratory scale. Using targeted, non-targeted analysis (NTA), total organic fluorine (TOF), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) this study will aim to close the PFAS mass balance across the system to the extent possible within current analytical constraints. Preliminary assessment of the donor wastewater solids and laboratory system operation suggest specific PFAS can be detected, above the method reporting limits, in the gas emissions at high DREs, see Figure 3. Furthermore, to our knowledge NTA has not been reported yet on wastewater solid pyrolysis systems. NTA identifies PFAS not currently evaluated for in the standardized USEPA Method 537 (2020b). This will help determine what 'other' PFAS are present in wastewater solids, biochar, and gas emissions.
Conclusions
This paper and presentation will provide the WEF audience a detailed summary of the current published literature on the fate of PFAS through pyrolysis systems. This summary identifies the gaps in knowledge and the proposed study takes the first step in evaluating the emissions from the system post thermal oxidation, consistent with existing configurations. An in-depth discussion on the study sampling and analytical procedures will provide the wastewater community a valuable resource on PFAS measurement. Additional value will be provided by way of the available study results.
PFAS partition to the solids generated during wastewater. Pyrolysis systems offer the potential to destroy PFAS, especially when coupled with a thermal oxidizer for off-gas treatment. Limited information can be found on the fate of PFAS through high-temperature process. This paper discusses a collaborative research effort to define PFAS behavior through a laboratory-scale pyrolyzer and thermal oxidizer validated against performance from a full-scale facility.
SpeakerWinchell, Lloyd
Presentation time
14:00:00
14:15:00
Session time
13:30:00
15:00:00
TopicIntermediate Level, Biosolids and Residuals, PFAS
TopicIntermediate Level, Biosolids and Residuals, PFAS
Author(s)
Winchell, Lloyd
Author(s)Lloyd Winchell1; Franco Berruti2; Alexandre Miot3; John Ross4; Mary L. Romero5; Aren Hansen6
Author affiliation(s)Brown and Caldwell, St. Paul, MN1; Institute for Chemicals and Fuels from Alternative Resources, ON, Canada2; Silicon Valley Clean Water, Redwood City,CA3; Brown and Caldwell, Detroit, MI4; Brown and Caldwell, Walnut Creek, CA5; Brown and Caldwell, Walnut Creek, CA6
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2022
DOI10.2175/193864718825158645
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2022
Word count12
End of menu
Start of menu

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task
End of menu

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Winchell, Lloyd. PFAS Fate in Pyrolysis System Reflecting Full-Scale Configurations: Thermal Oxidizer Impacts. Water Environment Federation, 2022. Web. 28 May. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10083925CITANCHOR>.
Winchell, Lloyd. PFAS Fate in Pyrolysis System Reflecting Full-Scale Configurations: Thermal Oxidizer Impacts. Water Environment Federation, 2022. Accessed May 28, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10083925CITANCHOR.
Winchell, Lloyd
PFAS Fate in Pyrolysis System Reflecting Full-Scale Configurations: Thermal Oxidizer Impacts
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
October 11, 2022
May 28, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10083925CITANCHOR