Downing, Leon

Dr. Leon Downing is the Global Practice and Technology Leader for Nutrient Removal and Recovery and the Director of the Innovation Platform for Treatment Solutions for Black & Veatch from Madison, Wisconsin. He also serves as an adjunct professor at the University of Wisconsin. Downing provides technology leadership in support of Black & Veatch process engineering and applied research projects globally.

Titles from this speaker

Comparing Four Innovative Technologies for Enhanced Leachate Treatment: An Evaluation of PFAS Foam Fractionation Efficacy

Abstract

Introduction: PFAS, a group of chemicals widely used in various applications due to their water and oil resistance, are persistent, toxic, and accumulate in the environment. Disposal of products containing PFAS in landfills can result in PFAS contamination in the landfill leachate that is discharged to water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) andwhich can lead to groundwater contamination (REF1). Foam fractionation (FF) is a process that utilizes the surfactant nature of PFASs to separate them into foam, which is collected as a concentrate for further treatment (REF2). FF significantly reduces the volume of PFAS-containing waste, making it an ideal first step in a PFAS treatment process. This study evaluates four different FF technologies and provides insights for their implementation based on bench scale comparison results. Materials and methods: In this study, four technologies were evaluated for PFAS removal. The technologies and their providers are listed as TechA, TechB, TechC, and TechD in Table 1. Equalized volume samples (55 liters) were collected from an anonymous facility's EQ-tank and distributed to different technology providers for testing. Leachate wet chemistry parameters samples were determined in accordance with APHA standard methods. Table 2 lists the analyzed parameters. A total of 40 PFAS compounds were quantified using the EPA 1633 method, the Total Oxidizable Precursor, and the Total Organic Fluorine assay. Table 3 provides a complete list of these compounds and their concentrations before FF. Results and discussion PFAS Removal Efficiency: The study evaluated the removal efficiency of different PFAS into the foam phase for the four FF technology providers. The findings, depicted in Figure 1, align with previous literature: longer fluorocarbon chains and the presence of a more surface-active sulfonic acid head group result in greater PFAS removal compared to its carboxylic counterpart. The study also shows that removal efficiency improves exponentially with longer fluorocarbon chains, and chains longer than six carbons resulted in undetected levels. This supports previous research that suggests chain length has a greater impact than head group. Longer fluorocarbon chains make PFAS less soluble and more hydrophobic, enhancing its ability to adsorb onto air-water interfaces due to their superior surface properties. Impact of Process Configuration: Technology providers employed different strategies in using FF as indicated in Table 1. A notable finding from comparing these technologies is the effectiveness of cationic co-surfactants in removing PFAS. The cationic headgroup of these co-surfactants allows for binding to PFAS at the water-air interface. TechA and TechB tested a wide range of co-surfactants at 100 mg/L and found that CTAB-based surfactants are favorable in reducing the short-chain compounds up to 50% removal. The consistent observation of the use of co-surfactants showed enhanced stability and density of the foam that helps accumulate more foam and minimize the extent of interstitial liquid drainage before the foam is harvested (REF4). However, TechC experiments showed no impact of using 8 mg/L co-surfactant compared to the absence of co-surfactant. This can be attributed to reduction of additive performance due to electrostatic uptake by competing contaminants in leachate, suggesting the need for a higher dose. For TechC it was found that a 45-minute contact time is sufficient to achieve non-detection levels of long-chain PFAS in a leachate primarily dominated by PFCAs. The study also assessed the impact of the number of FF units in series, with the consensus being that using two to three treatment units is adequate to achieve the desired removal. TechD's proprietary model approach showed that increasing the treatment stages from 3 to 5 resulted in a 10% increase in the removal of short-chain PFAS, while long-chains remained non-detectable in both cases. TechC's unique two-stage method involves de-foaming the leachate from the first fractionation unit and then re-foaming the primary foamate generated over repeated primary fractionation cycles (Figure 2). This approach significantly reduces generated foam volumes, condensing the volume of foam by up to 180 times in the secondary foamate, minimizing the capital and operating costs associated with downstream destruction technologies. Conclusions 1.Findings of this work are illustrated in Figure 3. 2.Long-chain PFAS have been effectively removed to below detection limit, while short-chain PFAS require a polishing step using adsorptive media due to their low removal rate. However, this poses challenges due to the high fouling potential of the media. Therefore, the implementation of FF and modifications to its configuration strongly depend on treatment objectives and upcoming regulations. 3.For the specific leachate that was tested, a 45-minute contact time of and up to three treatment stages in series were sufficient for removing long-chain PFAS. However, these factors may vary based on the quality of the leachate water being treated. 4.FF is a highly selective method for removing surfactants without altering effluent water quality. This results in an effluent with similar water quality to the influent but significantly reduced concentrations of PFAS, VOCs, total suspended solids, and iron.

This article discusses how foam fractionation (FF) technology can effectively remove Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances (PFAS) from landfill leachate. The study found that FF is a highly selective method for removing surfactants without altering effluent water quality. These findings are crucial in addressing PFAS contamination in landfills and guiding the implementation of different FF configurations for PFAS removal.

SpeakerSabba, Fabrizio

Presentation time

13:30:00

13:50:00

Session time

13:30:00

15:00:00

SessionPFAS Removal and Destruction Using Novel Technologies

Session number605

Session locationRoom 244

TopicIndustrial Issues and Treatment Technologies, Intermediate Level, PFAS, Research and Innovation

Author(s)

Sabba, Fabrizio, Kassar, Christian, Hunter, Gary, Downing, Leon

Author(s)F. Sabba1, C. Kassar2, G.L. Hunter3, L.S. Downing4

Author affiliation(s)1Black & Veatch, NJ, 2Black & Veatch, AZ, 3Black & Veatch, SC, 4Black and Veatch, WI

SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation

Document typeConference Paper

PublisherWater Environment Federation

Print publication date Oct 2024

DOI10.2175/193864718825159515

Volume / Issue

Content sourceWEFTEC

Word count16

Description: Diversifying Carbon for Phosphorus Removal: Understanding RAS Fermentation and...

Diversifying Carbon for Phosphorus Removal: Understanding RAS Fermentation and S2EBPR

Abstract

Management of the global phosphorus cycle is crucial for long-term sustainability. Water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) play a critical role in in the phosphorus control and balance in many watersheds throughout North America, and the discharge of soluble and other bioavailable forms of phosphorus from WRRFs has a global impact on soluble-nutrient balances in the water cycle.
Enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) is one key process applied to remove phosphorus from the liquid discharges at WRRFs. Through EBPR, phosphorus is concentrated from the wastewater into the biosolids stream, where it can be recovered in biosolids or extracted as a fertilizer product. Recycling phosphorus in this way helps close the phosphorus cycle without discharging phosphorus into waterbodies. Over the past 50 years, EBPR has evolved from an unexplained phenomenon to a widely adopted process that is simultaneously praised for its efficiency and environmental soundness and, cursed for its instability. Understanding of the process has never been complete, but recent advances in the research and interests in alternative processes at the facility mean the time has come to enhance water-sector understanding with the latest knowledge of EBPR ecology, functionality, and design. One of the key innovations for phosphorus removal has been the adoption of sidestream EBPR (S2EBPR) concepts into the design of EBPR facilities. These concepts focus on fermentative activity of phosphate accumulation organisms (PAOs) to drive EBPR, often in sidestream reactors. These sidestream reactors focus on hydrolysis of a portion of return activated sludge (RAS) or mixed liquor (ML) to select for PAOs and drive phosphorus removal. Conventional design EBPR focused on providing volatile fatty acids (VFAs) to PAOs in an influent anaerobic zone. As an alternative, RAS fermentation diverts a portion of RAS flow to a longer hydraulic retention time (HRT) sidestream reactor. In this sidestream reactor, biomass and particulate COD is fermented to generate the VFA required for PAO metabolism. In a strict RAS fermentation reactor, this results is selection of PAO metabolism without direct use of influent readily biodegradable COD (rbCOD) or VFA. In a carbon focused wastewater paradigm, this provides increased flexibility for COD diversion and capture; use of influent rbCOD for nitrogen removal; and potentially more stable phosphorus removal due to a lack of sensitivity to influent COD characteristics.
This presentation will present the most recent results from Water Research Foundation project 4975, which is focused on developing practical guidelines for fermentative phosphorus removal processes. An overview of the project and concepts will be presented, with a focus on carbon balance and carbon sources for EBPR. Three case studies will then be presented, each with a different focus: â€¢RAS fermentation and the importance of effluent nitrate (Figure 1) â€¢RAS fermentation with carbon addition and the approach to developing an EBPR carbon balance (Figure 2) â€¢Mixed liquor fermentation and impacts of low DO operation (Figure 3) Attendees will be exposed to operational experience, as well as take home messages about designing for fermentation processes in EBPR systems. Example design curves for a facility will be presented (Figure 4) with an explanation of the design approach for RAS fermentation.

Attendees will be exposed to operational experience, as well as take home messages about designing for fermentation processes in EBPR systems. Example design curves for a facility will be presented with an explanation of the design approach for RAS fermentation. More details related to RAS fermentation will be available in WRF Report 4975, set to be published in January 2023.

SpeakerDowning, Leon

Presentation time

08:35:00

08:50:00

Session time

08:30:00

10:00:00

TopicAdvanced Level, Facility Operations and Maintenance, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design, Nutrients, Research and Innovation

Author(s)

Downing, Leon

Author(s)Leon Downing1; Patrick Dunlap2; Eric Redmond3; James Barnard4

Author affiliation(s)Black & Veatch1; Black & Veatch2; Black & Veatch3; Black & Veatch4

SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation

Document typeConference Paper

PublisherWater Environment Federation

Print publication date Oct 2022

DOI10.2175/193864718825158499

Volume / Issue

Content sourceWEFTEC

Word count11

Description: Exploring the Carbon Balance in a Sidestream Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal...

Exploring the Carbon Balance in a Sidestream Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (S2EBPR) Demonstration Facility

Abstract

Introduction
Conventional design of enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) focuses on providing volatile fatty acids (VFAs) to phosphate accumulating organisms (PAOs) in an influent anaerobic zone. As an alternative, sidestream EBPR (S2EBPR) diverts a portion of RAS flow to a longer hydraulic retention time (HRT) sidestream reactor. In this sidestream reactor, biomass and particulate COD is fermented to generate the VFA required for PAO metabolism. In a strict RAS fermentation reactor, this results in selection of PAO metabolism without direct use of influent readily biodegradable COD (rbCOD) or VFA. In a carbon focused wastewater paradigm, this provides increased flexibility for COD diversion and capture; use of influent rbCOD for nitrogen removal; and potentially more stable phosphorus removal due to a lack of sensitivity to influent COD characteristics. In addition, moving the PAO selection to the sidestream provides increased infrastructure flexibility for incorporation of EBPR into existing facilities. The Wisconsin Rapids Wastewater Treatment Plant (WRWWTP) began pilot testing of RAS fermentation in April 2021. The facility moved through a series of operational setpoints (Figure 1) to optimize phosphorus removal. One of the keys was the addition of a cranberry waste to provide additional carbon for RAS fermentation. By the end of the testing period, effluent total phosphorus was averaging less than 0.4 mg/L with no chemical addition (Figure 2).
Carbon Balance Exploration
To better understand why the S2EBRP configuration was working at the WRWWTP, a series of bench-scale tests were completed to explore the carbon balance for the facility. Batch RAS fermentation rate tests were completed as previously described (WRF Project UR13). The fermentation rate tests provided an indication of the amount of soluble biodegradable COD (sbCOD) produced per mass of volatile solids in the fermenter. On average, a fermentation rate of 1.5 mg sbCOD/g vss-hr was observed over the testing period (Figure 3). This is a critical piece of information, as it provides insight into how much carbon can be released from RAS fermentation. Phosphorus release and uptake rate testing (Figure 4) provided insight into the use of carbon by PAOs in the system. As EBPR was established, the sbCOD:P ratio was reduced to 13:1 (Figure 5).
This information provides insight into the ratio of carbon required by PAOs in the S2EBPR reactor. The last set of batch experiments explored the phosphorus release rate of the ecology with various external carbon sources. The full-scale system was fed a cranberry juice wastewater, with was dominated by sugars. During bench scale testing, the cranberry juice exhibited the highest release rate of the three carbon sources tested (Figure 6). This difference is likely driven by an adaption of the ecology to the carbon source, and not specifically tied to the cranberry juice. Although, cranberry juice is well noted for its overall health benefits, and the antioxidants from Wisconsin grown cranberries may provide additional benefits to PAOs. But this detail was not explored during this research. The bench scale testing provided the information to complete the carbon mass balance for an S2EBPR system (Figure 7). Using the measured rates, the sbCOD deficiency can be calculated. If a deficiency is occurring, a reduced level of effluent phosphorus removal performance would be anticipated. If the deficiency is zero, or if extra carbon is available in the RAS fermenter, effluent phosphorus concentrations should be reduced. As shown in Figure 8, the mass balance around carbon correlated to observed effluent phosphorus performance.
Benefits and Significance
This presentation will provide a detailed review of an extensive testing of S2EBPR. The following benefits will be provided to the audience: - High-level review of bench testing protocols - Value proposition for adding bench testing to operational data for EBPR and S2EBPR facilities - Outline of how to complete a carbon balance for an S2EBPR facility - Target values for fermentation and sbCOD:TP in S2EBPR facilities These results will be significant for anyone planning, designing, or operating an EBPR facility.

This presentation will provide a detailed review of an extensive testing of S2EBPR. The following benefits will be provided to the audience: - High-level review of bench testing protocols - Value proposition for adding bench testing to operational data for EBPR and S2EBPR facilities - Outline of how to complete a carbon balance for an S2EBPR facility - Target values for fermentation and sbCOD:TP in S2EBPR facilities

SpeakerDowning, Leon

Presentation time

09:25:00

09:40:00

Session time

08:30:00

10:00:00

TopicAdvanced Level, Facility Operations and Maintenance, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design, Nutrients, Research and Innovation

Author(s)

Downing, Leon

Author(s)Ryan Giefer1; Derek Budsberg2; Stefania Marroquin3; Leon Downing4

Author affiliation(s)City of Wisconsin Rapids1; City of Wisconsin Rapids2; Black & Veatch3; Black & Veatch4

SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation

Document typeConference Paper

PublisherWater Environment Federation

Print publication date Oct 2022

DOI10.2175/193864718825158533

Volume / Issue

Content sourceWEFTEC

Word count15

Modelling of Primary Sludge and RAS Fermentation for Carbon Management Optimization at WRRFs

Abstract

Introduction Conventional wastewater treatment plants are transitioning to integrated resource recovery and upcycling, which requires effective management of biodegradable organic carbon. This involves developing approaches to carbon diversion, such as anaerobic digestion of primary sludge and waste activated sludge for energy and fertilizer (Gavala et al 2003). Alongside the push to enhance resource recovery, many WRRFs are also under pressure to meet strict effluent nutrient (N and P) discharge targets. While new nitrogen management strategies that do not rely on carbon are emerging, the majority of nutrient removal systems still follow a conventional, optimized nitrification-denitrification pathway that relies on biodegradable organic carbon to support denitrification. Moreover, biodegradable organic carbon is crucial for biological phosphorus removal. Years of experience have demonstrated that successful biological nutrient removal depends not only on sufficient organic substrate, but also on the right type of bioavailable carbon supplied at the appropriate location and time for optimal utilization (Wu et al, 2009; Huang et al, 2018). Our research aims to determine the best way to utilize the variety of organic-carbon rich feedstocks available in a WRRF and how fermentation can be used as a platform process to manage the logistics of biodegradable organic carbon supply and demand. To address these questions, we conducted a pilot-scale assessment of the fermentation of a blend of wastewater-derived primary sludge (PS) and waste activated sludge (RAS) from two treatment plants. Plant 1, which only performs BOD removal, has a short solid retention time (SRT) of 2 days, while Plant 2 performs biological nutrient removal (both TN and TP) and has a longer SRT of 10 days. We conducted batch fermentation experiments on different blends of RAS and PS over a two-week period to analyze biomass kinetics and the products formed during fermentation. We used the SUMO simulator software to model each batch experiment, calibrate the two-week experimental data, and analyze the hydrolysis rates and influent fractionation variations based on the feedstock characteristics. Material and Methods Experimental Set-up Pilot-scale fermentation experiments were performed using a purpose built two-tank pilot system (Figure 1). Each bioreactor have a capacity of 75 L (20 gal). The temperature was controlled at 20 degrees C in each bioreactor. Each fermentation experiment was run in duplicate for 14 days. Three blend scenarios of RAS and PS were targeted, for both Plant 1 and Plant 2 feedstocks: 1)RAS only 2)50% RAS and 50% PS in VSS mass 3)100% PS Modelling Data from each batch experiment were modelled using Sumo Dynamita to validate the observed results as well as elucidate the biological processes. Full plant models were configured for Plant 1 and Plant 2 (see Figure 2) and an SBR process unit was used to represent the pilot reactor. Default influent parameters and fractionation for the full plant models were initially used and were tuned in order to match the TCOD, TSS, VSS, sCOD, NHx and OP data. After the initial conditions were matched, the kinetics and biology were calibrated until the experimental curves were fitted. The reduction factor of anaerobic hydrolysis was also tuned from the 0.5 default to the 0.05-0.15 range, as observed in the Water Research Foundation 4975 report. Results and Discussion Figure 3 shows the timeseries of the soluble COD yield, expressed as mass of sCOD produced per unit mass of VSS (mgCOD/gVSS) throughout the experiment for the different RAS and PS blends, for both short SRT combinations (left) and long SRT combinations (right). For each test, the experimental data was simulated on SUMO and the results of the calibrated models are shown in the dashed line. It can be noticed that the sCOD yield is different between the different PS and RAS blend combinations and also between the long and short SRT RAS. Overall, the highest fermentation rate is achieved around 3 days from the start of the experiment for all the tests. Higher sCOD yields are shown in the first week, while the sCOD production largely slows down in the second week of the test. Figure 4, left) shows the 3-day fermentation rate comparison for the different RAS and PS blends, for both short SRT and long SRT RAS biomass. The reduction factor of the anaerobic hydrolysis kinetic parameter was calibrated for each test and varied between the different feedstock blends (Figure 4, right), showing higher hydrolysis rates with higher fermentation rates and higher PS content, as reported by Ozyildiz et al 2023. The average 3 day fermentation rates ranged from 0.25+/-0.1 mg sCOD/gVSS/h for long RAS only to 3.1+/-0.2 mg sCOD/gVSS/h for 50% PS and 50% RAS, long SRT. Overall, the 50/50 ratio was noticed to be the optimum ratio to maximize soluble COD production, with both RAS types, however a higher fermentation rate (around 50% higher) was achieved when longer SRT RAS was combined with PS compared to the short SRT/PS blends. The fermentation performance is driven by the ratio between the concentration of hydrolysing microorganisms, mainly deriving from RAS, and the fermentable substrate, which is more available in primary sludge. Our research outcomes will be of value to utilities aiming to integrate the stringent effluent nutrient (N and P) discharge targets with energy and resource

The main objective of this pilot fermentation testing was to evaluate the most effective utilization of the range of organic-carbon rich feedstocks within a water resource recovery facility (WRRF). Experimental results suggest that a 50-50 blend of primary sludge (PS) and return activate sludge (RAS) fermentation leads to highest sCOD yield. The experiments were modelled using SUMO by calibrating the hydrolysis rate, plant influent fractionation, and the hydrogen production yield.

SpeakerCecconi, Francesca

Presentation time

16:30:00

17:00:00

Session time

15:30:00

17:00:00

SessionEBPR Pulse: Current Trends, Full-Scale Optimization, Model for Sustainability

Session number227

Session locationRoom 243

TopicAdvanced Level, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design, Nutrients

Author(s)

Cecconi, Francesca, Pifer, Leah, Bhattarai, Bishav, Downing, Leon

Author(s)F. Cecconi1, L. Pifer1, B. Bhattarai1, L.S. Downing2

Author affiliation(s)1Black & Veatch, CA, 1, 2Black and Veatch, WI

SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation

Document typeConference Paper

PublisherWater Environment Federation

Print publication date Oct 2024

DOI10.2175/193864718825159568

Volume / Issue

Content sourceWEFTEC

Word count14

Navigating Carbon Limits: Lessons Learned from Small and Full-scale S2EBPR Operation in a C-limited Facility

Abstract

Introduction Water reclamation facilities use enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) to prevent the release of phosphorus into aquatic environments. Phosphorus-accumulating organisms (PAO) drive EBPR by using rbCOD to perform phosphorus cycling. However, PAO may compete with other desirable heterotrophs and glycogen-accumulating organisms (GAO). Sidestream EBPR (S2EBPR) is designed to reduce upsets from low or unreliable rbCOD in influent wastewater. In this study, Calumet WRP conducted a small-scale and full-scale study of S2EBPR to achieve effluent P goals below 1 mgP/L. This study evaluated the performance of S2EBPR with and without external carbon dosing, compared small-scale findings to full-scale performance, and assessed the PAO and GAO community over time. Methods Small- and full-scale reactors (SSR and FSR) were operated at Calumet WRP for 1 year, in 2019 and 2021, respectively (Figure 1a and 1b; also see Sabba et al. 2023 and Farmer et al. 2023 for additional details about the FSR). The SSR was supplied with external C addition in 3 phases: 50, 25 and 0% C. The FSR was also operated with changing C dosing, 2 periods with C and 2 periods without. Composite samples of reactor effluent were collected on a daily and/or weekly basis for TP, OP NH3−N, NOx, TKN, BOD5, total and volatile suspended solids and VFA and measured with EPA and APHA standard methods. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed on samples collected from SSR and FSR, and metagenomic sequencing was performed on select samples from the FSR. Results SSR S2EBPR findings Batch testing was to measure P uptake on nitrate and oxygen in the SSR (Figure 2a). Oxygen-driven P uptake appeared to be the main contributor to P removal. However, the weekly average P removal observed in the reactor was significantly correlated with nitrate-driven rate, not the oxygen-driven rate, suggesting that nitrate-driven P uptake was important for overall performance (Figure 2b). Overall, these results suggest a higher proportion of PAO can denitrify than previously reported (Nielsen et al., 2019). Figure 3a and 3c shows the relative abundance of PAO and GAO population in the SSR during the three C phases. Despite the C reduction, overall, the S2EBPR shows stability of PAO population, including the canonical PAO Accumulibacter, with only a slight decrease in relative abundance of Tetrasphaera. Interestingly the decrease of C to 0% did not lead to exclusion of GAO but rather, a stable population of Ca. Competibacter and Micropruina was established. FSR S2EBPR findings Figure 3b displays the relative abundance of PAO and GAO in the FSR during the four C phases. Both PAO and GAO populations increased and established during the two phases where C was dosed. Notably, Ca. Competibacter increased during phase III (C on) and persisted during phase IV (C off). To further investigate the trends observed in the FSR with regards to PAO and GAO and connect them with denitrification-based P uptake observed in Figure 2, we next analyzed the denitrification pathway using metagenomic sequencing data with a focus on denitrifying PAO and GAO (known as DPAO and DGAO). We mapped our metagenomic reads to curated denitrifying genes from Ca. Accumulibacter, Dechloromonas, Tetraphaera, and Ca. Competibacter. We found that the complete denitrification pathway was encoded by DPAO and DGAO, but there were considerable differences in the gene abundances amongst the organisms. For example, most nitrate reductases mapped to narG from Ca. Accumulibacter, but the nitric oxide reductases mapped to nor genes from Ca. Competibacter, suggesting that the DPAO and DGAO may have been partial denitrifiers. Our metagenomic findings also point to the possibility of N2O accumulation due to incomplete denitrification, though further analysis of the denitrification pathway completeness considering other denitrifying bacteria is needed to increase our confidence. Comparison of SSR and FSR performance External C dosing had a substantial impact on P removal performance in both SSR and FSR. In the SSR, the median OP removal was 90% with the 50% C dose, compared to 83% with the 25% C dose and 50% without dosing. In the FSR, both the 50% and 25% C dosing conditions achieved less than 1mgP/L with a median effluent 0.49 and 0.40 mgP/L, respectively. The FSR exhibited similar trends; the median OP removal was 90% with C dosing (average of 3.3 L/min) compared to a median of 15% OP removal, as well as occasional net OP release, without C dosing. The median effluent OP from the FSR was 0.29 mgP/L under the high C dosing condition, also achieving the less than 1mgP/L goal. Overall, the performance was comparable between the SSR and the FSR, despite the differences in C dosing regimes and reactor configurations. Benefits and significance This presentation will highlight the successful scale-up of an S2EBPR process from a small lab-scale system to a full-scale demonstration, as well as the potential role of DPAO in combined P and N removal. For practitioners, this work will provide insights into optimizing EBPR systems at low carbon facilities, understanding how DPAO can contribute to P and N removal, and operating relevant pilot studies to inform full-scale work. For researchers, our findings on denitrification gene abundances are relevant for further study of truncated denitrification pathways in DPAO and DGAO.

This paper assesses the performance of S2EBPR at Calumet WRP in achieving effluent P goals below 1 mgP/L. It compares small-scale findings to full-scale performance, including the impact of external carbon dosing on P removal. The study highlights the potential role of denitrifying phosphorus-accumulating organisms in combined P and N removal and provides insights for optimizing EBPR systems at low-carbon facilities and operating relevant pilot studies to inform full-scale work.

SpeakerSabba, Fabrizio

Presentation time

11:00:00

11:30:00

Session time

10:30:00

12:00:00

SessionUsing Side-Stream Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal to Improve EBPR Performance

Session number523

Session locationRoom 350

TopicFacility Operations and Maintenance, Intermediate Level, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design, Nutrients

Author(s)

Sabba, Fabrizio, Farmer, McKenna, Jia, Zhen, Wells, George, Downing, Leon

Author(s)F. Sabba1, M. Farmer2, Z. Jia2, G. Wells3, L.S. Downing4

Author affiliation(s)1Black & Veatch, NJ, 2Northwestern University, IL, 3, IL, 4Black and Veatch, WI

SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation

Document typeConference Paper

PublisherWater Environment Federation

Print publication date Oct 2024

DOI10.2175/193864718825159516

Volume / Issue

Content sourceWEFTEC

Word count16

Description: Nitrification Kinetics of a Full-scale, Low DO Activated Sludge System: Online...

Nitrification Kinetics of a Full-scale, Low DO Activated Sludge System: Online Monitoring for Process Analysis and Operational Training

Abstract

Black & Veatch (BV) in collaboration with the Trinity River Authority of Texas (TRA) at the Central Regional Wastewater System treatment plant (CRWS) developed an implementation plan of the in-tank nitrification rate (INR) reactor. Nitrification rate testing is a tool to assist with early identification of process health and identify variability in nitrification kinetics in a low dissolved oxygen (DO) activated sludge system. The TRA CRWS facility currently operates the secondary system in a low DO environment with ammonium-based airflow controls (ABAC). A low DO comammox Nitrospira nitrifying community has been documented at the facility. The INR reactor was proposed as a measure that allows TRA CRWS operation to monitor the health of the overall activated sludge bacterial community health continuously without adding the burden of monitoring and sampling on the operators.

The following conference paper was presented at WEFTEC 2021, October 16-20, 2021. To read the full abstract, see "Abstract" tab below.

SpeakerDowning, Leon

Presentation time

16:45:00

17:30:00

Session time

16:00:00

17:30:00

SessionKnowledge Development Forum: Process Intensification Using Low DO Operation - Is It Possible and What Can I Control and Look For?

Session number316

TopicFacility Operations and Maintenance, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design, Research and Innovation

Author(s)

Leon Downing

Author(s)L. Downing1;E. Redmond2;McK. Farmer3;M. Reeves4;M. Young5;

Author affiliation(s)Black & Veatch, Madison, WI1Black & Veatch, Des Moines, IA2Black & Veatch, Chicago, IL3Trinity River Authority of Texas, Grand Prairie, TX4,5

SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation

Document typeConference Paper

PublisherWater Environment Federation

Print publication date Oct 2021

DOI10.2175/193864718825158178

Volume / Issue

Content sourceWEFTEC

Word count19

Description: Operational Considerations for Integration of AquaNereda Reactor Expansion with an...

Operational Considerations for Integration of AquaNereda Reactor Expansion with an Existing Activated Sludge Facility

Abstract

Introduction The application of the AquaNereda® process, were aerobic granular sludge (AGS) is applied in a sequencing reactor, is often seen as a replacement for the conventional activated sludge process. AquaNereda(R) is a sequencing process that utilizes a single tank for react and settle phases, and therefore is often not compatible as a retrofit with existing activated sludge systems that utilize separate tanks for reaction (aeration basins) and settle (final clarifiers). While this can be seen as a limitation for the application of AquaNereda(R), there is an opportunity to construct an expansion of facilities with AquaNereda(R), and then integrate the AquaNereda(R) in parallel to a conventional activated sludge plant. Four Rivers Sanitation Authority (FRSA), located in Rockford, Illinois, is currently working towards this integrated overall facility. While maintaining 40 mgd of average day flow capacity in a more conventional biological nutrient removal (BNR) activated sludge facility, FRSA is adding an additional 10 mgd of average day flow capacity with a new AquaNereda(R) AGS facility. The AGS facility will be operational in 2025, with the BNR upgrades being completed in 2026. During design of the new facilities at FRSA, the largest question for integration of the processes became how to manage the waste activated granular sludge (WAGS). Given the characteristics of WAGS in terms of percent solids as well as the sequencing wasting schedule from AquaNereda(R), it was decided to send the WAGS into the activated sludge system and then to waste to solids handling (see Figure 1 for a process flow diagram). The waste activated sludge (WAS) would then contain flocs from the activated sludge process as well as WAGS. This simplified operation, but there were major questions related to the impact of WAGS on the activated sludge process. Potential oxygen demand impacts, nitrification rates, and settling rates were all of interest to FRSA to understand the impact of WAGS. While most facilities would rely solely on process modelling to assess these impacts, FRSA has access to WAGS for testing. The AquaNereda(R) demonstration facility is on site and operating with FRSA wastewater. This facility (treating 200,000 gpd) generates WAGS that can be utilized for testing. Approach and Methodology To help understand the impacts and strategies to manage WAGS from the AGS facility, a series of bench scale tests were completed using WAGS from the AquaNereda(R) demonstration facility and WAS from the existing FRSA aeration basins. Three sets of bench scale tests were completed:

*Settling rate testing to identify potential enhanced settling, as outlined by Daigger, Redmond, and Downing (2017)

*Specific oxygen uptake rate (SOUR) measurement, utilizing standard methods, to assess the oxygen demand of the WAGS. The WAGS have the potential to exert a significant oxygen demand, as past work has shown a biomethane production potential of WAGS that is similar to primary sludge (Guo et al., Digestibility of waste aerobic granular sludge from a full-scale municipal wastewater treatment system, 2020).

*Nitrification rate testing, as outlined by Melcer et al (2003), to identify any potential seeding effect from WAGS. Results and Outcomes To evaluate the effect of WAGS on the settling characteristics of the existing waste activated sludge (WAS), batch settling experiments were performed using WAS and a mixture of WAGS-WAS at various dilution ratios to generate settling curves. The WAGS-WAS mixture proportions were calculated based on the predicted WAGS flows from the new AGS facilities. Figure 2 provides the settling rate impacts. Addition of WAGS increased the settling rate of the activated sludge biomass. The effect on settling rate would increase the peak flow capacity of the activated sludge facilities from 110 mgd to 130 mgd. SOUR testing indicated that the WAGS would have a 25% higher oxygen uptake rate than WAS (Figure 3). This indicates that there will be an oxygen demand associated with either particulate COD bound in the WAGS or potentially stored carbon. This oxygen demand is considered during aeration operation in the activated sludge system. The nitrification rate of WAGS (4 mgN/gVSS-hr) was similar to the nitrification rate of WAS (3.9 mgN/gVSS-hr). This was an unexpected result, as the WAGS likely contains a high VSS content of particulate COD from the influent. The benefit is that the WAGS will be adding a significant load of nitrifiers into the activated sludge system, increasing system resilience. The outcomes from this testing highlight how construction of an AquaNereda(R) facility in parallel to an activated sludge facility can provide a net benefit to the activated sludge facility. Applicability AquaNereda(R) has been sold as the evolution of activated sludge, but the requirement for a sequencing reactor can been seen as a limitation. The work completed highlights how an AquaNereda(R) process can be constructed in parallel to an activated sludge system, with positive impacts on the activated sludge facility. Audience Appeal Anyone looking at process expansion, nutrient removal requirements, and aging infrastructure would benefit from this presentation.

Application AquaNereda®, where aerobic granular sludge (AGS) is applied in a sequencing reactor, is often seen as a replacement to conventional activated sludge. During design FRSA facilities, the largest question for integration of the processes became how to manage the waste activated granular sludge (WAGS). The decision to send WAGS into the activated sludge system was informed by bench results showing positive improvements to SVI, stored carbon diversion and no nitrification impacts.

SpeakerDowning, Leon

Presentation time

13:30:00

14:00:00

Session time

13:30:00

15:00:00

SessionEvaluating Plantwide Impacts of AGS and DAS

Session number606

Session locationRoom 343

TopicIntermediate Level, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design, Nutrients, Research and Innovation

Author(s)

Downing, Leon, Loconsole, Jennifer, Redmond, Eric

Author(s)L.S. Downing1, J.C. Loconsole2, E.D. Redmond3

Author affiliation(s)1Black and Veatch, WI, 2Black & Veatch, IL, 3Black & Veatch, IA

SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation

Document typeConference Paper

PublisherWater Environment Federation

Print publication date Oct 2024

DOI10.2175/193864718825159637

Volume / Issue

Content sourceWEFTEC

Word count15

Optimization Strategies: Improve P-removal (TRA) Case Study

Abstract

Converting a nitrification facility to a facility that achieves nitrogen and phosphorus removal can often require a significant amount of new infrastructure for a facility. The Trinity River Authority of Texas implemented an eight-year program to understand nutrient removal at low dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations. The result is the design and operation of a small-footprint, high performance facility.

SpeakerDowning, Leon

Presentation time

10:50:00

11:00:00

Session time

08:30:00

12:00:00

SessionStrategies to Optimize WRRFs for Nutrient Removal

Session number510

TopicNutrients, Research and Innovation

Author(s)

A. ShawL. DowningL. Downing

Author(s)A. Shaw1; L. Downing2; L. Downing2;

Author affiliation(s)Black & Veatch, TX1; Black & Veatch, WI2

SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation

Document typeConference Paper

PublisherWater Environment Federation

Print publication date Oct 2020

DOI10.2175/193864718825157511

Volume / Issue

Content sourceWEFTEC

Word count8

Description: Performance, Key Operational Parameters, and Design Targets For Nitrogen Removal...

Performance, Key Operational Parameters, and Design Targets For Nitrogen Removal During Post Aerobic Digestion (PAD): Analysis From Two Full-Scale PAD Reactors Over Multiple Years of Operation

Abstract

Background
Sequential anaerobic-aerobic digestion is an under-studied, under-used process that offers potential for improved solids digestion with simultaneous nutrient removal. Previous studies have highlighted the importance of post-aerobic digestion (PAD) following anaerobic sludge digestion and reported high volatile solids removal (VSR) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) reduction along with improved sludge dewaterability (Parravicini et al. 2008, Zupancic and Ros 2008). In addition, nitrogen removal can occur via nitrification and dentrification resulting in reduced nitrogen load recycled to the head of the plant (Novak et al 2011). Limited information is available on the PAD process for full-scale systems. Thus future design and current understanding of parameters that drive this process are not well documented or understood. The PAD process has been a critical component of overall nitrogen removal at the Northern Treatment Plant (NTP) for the Metro Water Recovery in Denver and the WRRF in Boulder. Analysis of these systems is needed to help fill this critical knowledge gap.
Status These full-scale reactors have been in operation for several years. Full-scale data have been collected for multiple years at both plants during times of healthy operation and poor performance. Analysis has been conducted on this data set. The presentation and proceeds will present work on this completed study. Findings Overall, the PAD process at both Boulder and Denver resulted in substantial removal of N and reduced the returned N burden. Boulder and Denver had similar average influent ammonia concentrations of approximately 1,600 mg/L (NH4-N). Denver had a longer SRT (Table 1) than Boulder, and slightly more ammonia removal than Boulder, but both plants achieved â‰¥ 80% ammonia removal. The VSR was slightly higher at Denver than Boulder, but both were near 10% which has been observed in lab-scale studies as well (Novak 2011). Denver had very low nitrite and nitrate levels, both less than 5 mg/L, implying substantial denitrification following nitrification. Denver's 91% TIN removal is substantial in terms of minimizing nitrogen that otherwise would be returned to the head of the plant. Boulder had higher levels of nitrite, over 50 mg/L, resulting in 80% removal of TIN, and thus a major reduction in nitrogen that would be returned to the head of the plant. While the average ammonia and TIN removals were similar between the two plants, the nitrogen loading rate and the nitrogen rate of removal was much greater at Boulder. Boulder operated at a lower SRT and consequently had an ammonia loading rate to the PAD reactor that was double that of Denver. The ammonia removal rate per volume of reactor and per kg VS was nearly double in the Boulder reactor compared to the Denver reactor. These data represent the first data set on two full-scale PAD operators and indicate that PAD can operate well over a wide range of feed rates and SRT values. At both Denver and Boulder, higher removal rates occurred at SRT values below 15 days (Figure 1). All removal rates above 125 mgN/L-day (indicated by blue line) occurred at SRT values less than 15 days. Conversely, when SRT values were above 15 days, the ammonia removal rate never surpassed 124 mgN/L-day. Lab-scale experiments revealed more than 80% removal and 10% VSR at an SRT value of 5 days (Novak et al. 2011). Based on these selected healthy operational data, an SRT value of 6 to 8 days would be an appropriate operational target. Ammonia removal rate was linearly correlated to nitrogen loading rate (Figure 2). Boulder had higher ammonia removal rates and higher nitrogen loading rates than Denver. The linear relationship between nitrogen loading rate and ammonia removal rate did not taper off across the ranges used. Therefore, it's possible that nitrogen loading rate could be increased even more to achieve higher ammonia removal rates. This result is similar to the SRT results above, i.e. that SRT could be decreased even more which would result in a higher nitrogen loading rate. For the Boulder data set, 94% of ammonia removal rate variance was explained by nitrogen loading rate. Loading rate is therefore a major driver of performance. Denver had a lower, but still strong R2 value of 69%. Slow changes to operation rates could reveal how much beyond the 0.3 gN/L-day threshold the loading rate could be increased. Both treatment plants had extended periods of healthy reactor operation, as evidenced above. Both plants had periods of poor performance (Figure 3). At Denver, ammonia removal rate had a steady decline beginning Fall, 2020 and lasting through mid 2021. The Boulder PAD reactor was off-line from September, 2018 until mid-summer, 2019. The functional data from all of these periods were evaluated together to determine the impact of operational parameters (SRT, pH, temperature) on process performance based on N removal. In general, the reactors operated well at pH values lower than 7.5 (Figure 4). At higher pH values and higher ammonia concentrations, free ammonia (NH3) toxicity and inhibition of nitrification can become an issue. Other data not shown here revealed that sudden changes to multiple parameters such as dropping pH and temperature can have confounding impacts. The PAD system is fundamentally driven by biology; when the microbial community is perturbed process upset occurs, leading to a rise in pH and process failure. The complete set of functional data will be presented at WEFTEC, including aeration rates, anoxic/oxic cycling times, SRT, and alkalinity.
Significance of the Investigation This is the first report to compare multiple full-scale PAD reactors relative to design criteria. Information on PAD reactors even at the lab-scale is scarce in literature. This technology, though, can be readily applied at WRRFs that have available tanks. The data presented in this proceedings and presentation can be used to determine how much additional ammonia removal could be achieved via PAD systems. Several key design parameters to consider for PAD design: - Ammonium loading rate: volumetric removal rates of up to 300 mg/L-day and were strongly correlated to loading rate - Sludge Retention Time (SRT): higher removal rates were observed at lower SRTs. - pH: ammonium removal was achieved at a pH range of 6 to 7.5. Bicarbonate alkalinity is the larger driver, which will be discussed during the presentation. - Volatile solids reduction: the VSR was consistently 9 to 10% - Operational stability: one key area to highlight is the importance of SRT stability in PAD For the Denver facility, it can be seen that periods of time where the SRT is changed rapidly correspond to effluent ammonium stability (Figure 5). There may be a tendency to think of PAD as an equalization volume before dewatering, but SRT stability is stressed.

This is the first report to compare multiple full-scale PAD reactors. This technology can be readily applied at WRRFs that have available tanks. The data presented in this proceedings and presentation can be used to determine how much additional ammonia removal could be achieved via PAD systems. This work also provides a range of healthy operational values similar to what the field has for anaerobic digestion. As PAD reactors gain in their popularity, they will be designed from scratch inste

SpeakerDowning, Leon

Presentation time

13:30:00

13:55:00

Session time

13:30:00

15:00:00

TopicIntermediate Level, Biosolids and Residuals, Facility Operations and Maintenance, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design

Author(s)

Downing, Leon

Author(s)Leon Downing1; Patrick Dunlap1; Christopher Marks2; Patrick McNamara1; Eric Redmond1; Thomas Worley-Morse3

Author affiliation(s)Black & Veatch1; City of Boulder2; Metro Wastewater Reclamation District3

SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation

Document typeConference Paper

PublisherWater Environment Federation

Print publication date Oct 2022

DOI10.2175/193864718825158579

Volume / Issue

Content sourceWEFTEC

Word count27

Primary Filtration Waste: How Do We Handle This High Volume Waste? Completing the Carbon Diversion PFD - SAF Pilot Results

Abstract

Introduction Intensification processes have been a focus largely for secondary and anaerobic treatment processes. These approaches have enabled utilities to increase performance, reduce footprint, and enable carbon redirection and capture. As we continue to evaluate drivers that include capacity, nutrient removal, carbon redirection, intensification, and energy reduction, enhanced primary treatment (EPT) plays a key role to whole facility integration considerations. Primary filtration technologies are increasingly evaluated as an alternative that enables high carbon redirection through >80% TSS and 50 to 70% BOD capture in a footprint that is approximately 25% of conventional primary clarification. This technology offers significant opportunity for facilities to divert carbon from liquid stream systems to anaerobic digestion, saving on aeration costs and increasing biogas production. However, full integration into existing facilities requires consideration to existing thickening facilities. Primary filter sludge is a high volume, low concentration that is 2 to 3x the volume seen with conventional primary clarifiers with a concentration of 3,000 to 5,000 mg/L. Further, the characteristics of the waste stream include a significant increase to non-settleable TSS and colloidal material that was previously not captured with conventional primary treatment. A comparison of anticipated capture efficiencies of thickening technologies (Figure 1) and footprints (Figure 2) indicates conventional gravity thickeners are significantly disadvantaged compared to other mechanical thickening technologies. Primary filter technologies are often solids limited vs. hydraulically limited (as in the case of tertiary filters). A reduction in capture efficiency of 5 to 10% has a resulting impact to filter loading rates, increasing surface area requirements by an equivalent rate. This technology review also indicated a potential opportunity for Suspended Air Flotation (SAF), offering a high hydraulic loading rate with potentially high capture efficiencies. SAF, provided by Heron Innovators, is similar to dissolved air flotation thickening but uses a surfactant to aid in solids separation and flotation. However, the technology had no primary sludge (filter or clarifier) thickening references and limited municipal waste activated sludge (WAS) case studies (with most installations to date being industrial applications). The Trinity River Authority of Texas (TRA) will soon be expanding the Denton Creek Regional Wastewater System (DCRWS) Facility. One component of the proposed expansion is the addition of primary filters. A preliminary assessment of a range of thickening technologies using economic and noneconomic factors indicated that SAF thickening could offer substantial economic benefits to TRA. Potentially, the SAF system could require the least amount of equipment, which correlates to a smaller footprint, and low chemical conditioning requirements, which translates to lower operations costs. As a result of the evaluation of technologies, SAF was selected as the basis of design for co-thickening blended (primary and waste-activated) solids. The decision to select SAF as the thickening option in this design constitutes an uncommon and innovative use of this technology. To confirm suitability of SAF for primary filter applications and to better understand the key design parameters driving SAF performance in the blended solids thickening application at DCRWS, a SAF pilot study was conducted at the Ten-Mile Creek Regional Wastewater System (TMCRWS) Facility. TRA and BV worked with Herron Innovators, Inc., providers of the SAF technology, to develop the pilot test. SAF systems are similar in concept to the older dissolved air flotation (DAF) systems in that both technologies float solids to the top of their respective tanks for thickening and removal. The key difference is that DAF systems use pressurized air dissolved in water while SAF systems instead employ a surfactant charged emulsion of air and water (also referred to as 'froth') to efficiently float solids. This allows SAF systems to achieve high solids loading rates (SLRs), which reduces equipment and space requirements. Table 1 provides a summary of key design criteria comparing DAF and SAF technologies. The SAF pilot setup explored low solids concentration, high volume feed solids conditions indicative of primary filter solids and blended solids (primary solids + WAS) thickening applications. Key questions were explored related to hydraulic and solids loading rates as well as polymer and froth dosages, to determine what targets for each of these primary design criteria are best correlated with overall thickening performance in terms of solids capture and the resulting thickened solids concentrations. The pilot was operated for a total of five weeks to test a range of loading rates and scenarios. Pilot Setup The SAF pilot study was conducted at TMCRWS from July 11th through August 18th, 2023. The study setup included a trailer-mounted pilot-scale SAF unit provided by Heron, specifically the CF125 model, which has a flow capacity of 350 gpm and a flotation area of 17 ft2. Throughout the study, TRA staff collected samples twice daily for analysis. Results The results of the pilot study which will be elaborated on in the full paper, include:

*Capture Efficiency oPrimary Solids Capture Efficiency — the primary solids thickening performance was excell

Primary filtration, increases capture efficiencies in a small footprint. However, the backwash creates challenges due to the large volume and low concentrations. Pilot study focused on Suspended Air Flotation (SAF), with primary and blended sludges. Results indicate SAF linked with primary filters is capable of high loading rates, 5 to 10x that of conventional dissolved air flotation (DAF), with capture efficiencies of 95% and 5% thickened sludge.

SpeakerRedmond, Eric

Presentation time

09:30:00

09:50:00

Session time

08:30:00

10:00:00

SessionThickening and Dewatering: Design Considerations

Session number301

Session locationRoom 354

TopicBiosolids and Residuals

Author(s)

Redmond, Eric, Knight, Greg, Ruff, Caitlin, Harness, Crystal, Downing, Leon

Author(s)E.D. Redmond1, G. Knight2, C. Ruff3, C. Harness4, L.S. Downing5

Author affiliation(s)1Black & Veatch, IA, 2Black & Veatch, GA, 3Black & Veatch, TX, 4, TX, 5Black and Veatch, WI

SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation

Document typeConference Paper

PublisherWater Environment Federation

Print publication date Oct 2024

DOI10.2175/193864718825159648

Volume / Issue

Content sourceWEFTEC

Word count21

Description: Repurposing Infrastructure for Phosphorus Removal: Developing Design Guidelines for...

Repurposing Infrastructure for Phosphorus Removal: Developing Design Guidelines for S2EBPR

Abstract

Management of the global phosphorus cycle is crucial for long-term sustainability. Water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) play a critical role in in the phosphorus control and balance in many watersheds throughout North America, and the discharge of soluble and other bioavailable forms of phosphorus from WRRFs has a global impact on soluble-nutrient balances in the water cycle. Enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) is one key process applied to remove phosphorus from the liquid discharges at WRRFs. Through EBPR, phosphorus is concentrated from the wastewater into the biosolids stream, where it can be recovered in biosolids or extracted as a fertilizer product. Recycling phosphorus in this way helps close the phosphorus cycle without discharging phosphorus into waterbodies. Over the past 50 years, EBPR has evolved from an unexplained phenomenon to a widely adopted process that is simultaneously praised for its efficiency and environmental soundness and cursed for its instability. Understanding of the process has never been complete, but recent advances in the research and interests in alternative processes at the facility mean the time has come to enhance water-sector understanding with the latest knowledge of EBPR ecology, functionality, and design. One of the key innovations for phosphorus removal has been the adoption of side stream EBPR (S2EBPR) concepts into the design of EBPR facilities. These concepts focus on fermentative activity of phosphate accumulation organisms (PAOs) to drive EBPR, often in side stream reactors. These side stream reactors focus on hydrolysis of a portion of return activated sludge (RAS) or mixed liquor (ML) to select for fermentative PAOs and drive phosphorus removal. This presentation will focus on results for the ongoing Water Research Foundation (WRF) project focused on developing practical considerations for S2EBPR design and operation (Project Number 4975). This project will yield guidelines for the design, operation, and implementation of a unique configuration to help remove phosphorus while maximizing the use of existing infrastructure. The re-purposing of existing infrastructure is a key benefit of S2EBPR configurations. When fermentative PAOs are the main driver for phosphorus removal, the selective pressure occurs in a side stream reactor typically conditioning RAS. Only 10 to 30% of the RAS is diverted to this side stream reactor, resulting in a relatively small reactor. Depending on the influent characteristics, this side stream reactor can ferment RAS, select for PAOs, and then this fermented flow is sent back to the existing aeration basins. This can result in a phosphorus removal upgrade the requires no modifications to the existing aeration basins, a smaller anaerobic side stream reactor, and often the side stream anaerobic reactor can be incorporated into existing, underutilized tankage for facilities. There are 14 full-scale demonstration facilities participating in the WRF project, and each facility has repurposed infrastructure in different ways. Some of the unique configurations being tested include:
- A Texas facility that utilized existing tanks to test ML fermentation to successfully achieve a 1 mg/L effluent limit with no new tanks (WRF Report 4827C) ###- A large midwestern facility that converted excess aeration basin capacity into a side stream reactor at a COD limited facility to achieve a 0.5 mg/L effluent limit
- A northeastern facility that utilized an abandoned gravity thickener tank to achieve a 0.3 mg/L effluent limit###- Danish facilities that utilize small RAS hydrolysis tanks with no mainstream selector zones to achieve phosphorus removal The facilities being tested, as well as past literature values, will be presented to observe trends in sizing and performance related to diversion rates of return activated sludge (RAS), hydraulic retention times of side stream reactors, and the ratio of biomass in the side stream reactor. One important concept is the idea of the fermenter biomass to total biomass in the system. This idea, first developed in Denmark, provides a design basis for S2EBPR that relates the time in the side stream anaerobic zone to the overall sludge retention time of the system. When well performing EBPR facilities are examined (effluent phosphorus below 0.75 mg/L), the generally fall above a curve developed for Danish facilities (Figure 1). Facilities that fall below this curve to not achieve consistent EBPR.

The following conference paper was presented at WEFTEC 2021, October 16-20, 2021. To read the full abstract, see "Abstract" tab below.

SpeakerDowning, Leon

Presentation time

13:30:00

13:45:00

Session time

13:30:00

15:00:00

SessionBringing It All Together: Guide to Designing and Implementing S2EBPR Processes

Session number502

TopicFacility Operations and Maintenance, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design, Nutrients

Author(s)

Leon Downing

Author(s)L. Downing1;E. Redmond2;P. Dunlap3;J. Barnard4;

Author affiliation(s)Black & Veatch, Madison, WI1Black & Veatch, Des Moines, IA2Black & Veatch, Philadelphia, PA3Black & Veatch, Kansas City, MO4

SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation

Document typeConference Paper

PublisherWater Environment Federation

Print publication date Oct 2021

DOI10.2175/193864718825158179

Volume / Issue

Content sourceWEFTEC

Word count11

Description: The Media is the Message: New Primary Treatment Process Based on Synthetic Media...

The Media is the Message: New Primary Treatment Process Based on Synthetic Media Biofiltration Allows for a More Sustainable and Resilient Alternative to CEPT in a Retrofittable Package

Abstract

This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2023 in Chicago, IL.

A new deep-bed primary filter was developed in Korea and transferred to North America as a more sustainable carbon diversion strategy than traditional chemically-enhanced primary treatment. This technology has been proven at scale and adapted to new markets by employing new configurations such as a biological split bed and retrofittable design.

SpeakerLiberzon, Jon

Presentation time

13:30:00

14:00:00

Session time

13:30:00

15:00:00

SessionPrimary Treatment Technologies: Should We Settle for Conventional Primary Sedimentation?

Session locationRoom S501a - Level 5

TopicEnergy Production, Conservation, and Management, Facility Operations and Maintenance, Intermediate Level, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design

Author(s)

Liberzon, Jonathan

Author(s)J. Liberzon 1; D. Rhu 2 ; M. Magruder 3; L.S. Downing 4; G.T. Daigger 5;

Author affiliation(s)Tomorrow Water 1; Tomorrow Water 2 ; Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District 3; Black & Veatch 4; University of Michigan 5;

SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation

Document typeConference Paper

PublisherWater Environment Federation

Print publication date Oct 2023

DOI10.2175/193864718825159002

Volume / Issue

Content sourceWEFTEC

Word count29

Understanding Nitrous Oxide (N2O) Impacts on Carbon Footprint When Considering the Full Footprint of Nutrient Removal

Abstract

Introduction Water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) have adopted low dissolved oxygen (DO) operation to reduce operating costs of activated sludge processes. However, the relationship between DO levels and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is complex and has attracted considerable interest. This modelling study investigated the impact of low DO conditions focusing on nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, energy consumption (expressed as carbon dioxide equivalent, CO2-eq), and the beneficial nutrient removal, which includes reduced external carbon and chemical inputs. Although low DO operation in Biological Nutrient Removal (BNR) processes may increase the risk of N2O production, the net environmental impact may be surprisingly positive. This presentation will shed light on the carbon footprint (CF) and trade-offs between N2O emissions, energy consumption, and system performance of low DO operation at WRRFs. Materials and methods: A process model was developed within SUMO v.22 simulation platform (Dynamita, France). The process model (Figure 1) was based on an existing WRRF in Texas (USA) and was calibrated and validated utilizing special sampling and historical influent as well as operational data (RAS, MLSS and WAS) obtained from the facility. Dynamic simulations were conducted over a 720-day period using historical data for low DO (0.5 mg/L) and conventional DO (2 mg/L) with two different influent characteristics (carbon rich, high C, and carbon-deficient, low C). The model outputs from the four scenarios were used to compute indirect GHG emissions stemming from electricity and chemicals. The aeration energy necessary to maintain the designated DO levels in the reactors was determined based on airflows derived from the model. Using a conversion factor of 25 scfm/hP, the total blower power requirement was estimated. This blower power was then converted to kWh and multiplied by the daily CO2-eq of consumed electricity. The chemical phosphorus removal process involved the use of alum, while methanol addition was presumed to reduce nitrates to a maximum concentration of 8 mg/L. Daily CO2-eq values for alum and methanol were employed to estimate carbon emissions from chemical consumption, contributing to the calculation of total indirect GHG emissions in a BNR system. Results and Discussion: The results presented in Figure 2 indicate that the cumulative indirect GHG emission rates were consistently lower for low DO operation across all four scenarios, regardless of the influent carbon content. The average emissions for low DO operation were 58% lower than high DO operation (red dashed lines in Figure 2). Figures 3 and 4 illustrate the total GHG emissions from non-N2O sources and reveal that high DO scenarios had a 28% higher average aeration energy, which posed denitrification challenges. To address these challenges, high DO operations required post-anoxic carbon dosing, which increased the CF. Conversely, low DO operations exhibited lower aeration energy and minimal chemical addition, with Case C requiring 98% less carbon dosing than Case A and D requiring 88% less than Case B. Based on blower energy use, external carbon, and chemical coagulant addition operating a BNR system at low DO setpoints results in a significant reduction in CF for the known emission sources. The key question the industry is facing is how much N2O is emitted from low DO setpoints, and if this N2O emission offsets the CF reduction from energy, carbon, and chemical addition. While there has been research investigating the impact of low DO operation on N2O production, the rate of N2O production for low DO system is far from an established metric. For low DO systems to have a net reduction in CF, the resulting N2O emissions would need to be less than the carbon reduction from the known parameters (energy use, chemical addition, carbon addition). If the CO2 reduction is converted to kg N2O, and related to kg N2O production per influent N, an estimation of how much N could be emitted as N2O can be made while maintaining a net CF benefit. As shown in Figure 5 an increase in the N converted to N2O of 0.4 to 0.8% would need to occur before low DO would result in a net increase in CF. Using IPCC guidelines, a typical activated sludge system emits 0.7% of the influent nitrogen as N2O. Therefore, a low DO system would only result in a net increase in CF if the N2O emissions doubled compared to a conventional DO system. Conclusions: Understanding N2O emissions is a major driver for WRRFs. While European and Australian facilities have advanced the understanding on the dynamics associated with N2O production in activated sludge, the impacts of low DO operation on the net CF of BNR facilities needs to be better understood. An important consideration when evaluating the net CF is not just the N2O emissions and energy impacts, but the potential reduction in carbon and chemical addition by moving to lower DO setpoints. The simulation work completed highlighted key aspects of N2O emissions:

*N2O emissions in a low DO system would need to double the N2O emissions from a conventional DO system to offset the carbon emissions savings from energy, carbon addition, and chemical addition savings from low DO operation

*The lower the influent COD, the larger the net carbon emission benefit of operating at low DO concentrations in a BNR basin

This paper was presented at the WEFTEC 2024 conference in New Orleans, LA October 5-9.

SpeakerDowning, Leon

Presentation time

15:30:00

15:40:00

Session time

15:30:00

17:00:00

SessionN2O Unmasked: Understanding and Taming Emissions

Session number426

Session locationRoom 253

TopicIntermediate Level, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design, Nutrients, Research and Innovation